MCAT practice · Biological and Biochemical Foundations · 1A Proteins and enzymes · 5D Biomolecule structure

Point mutations and the stability of a small protein

An original practice passage written for this site, not an AAMC item. Exam pace is about 8 minutes for a passage like this.

Small single-domain proteins usually unfold in one cooperative step, so the folded (F) and unfolded (U) states are the only species present in appreciable amounts. The stability of such a protein is the standard free energy of unfolding, ΔG°unf, for the reaction F ⇌ U. Because ΔG°unf is typically only 20–60 kJ/mol, a single amino acid substitution can shift it substantially.

Researchers studied P110, a 110-residue single-domain protein from a soil bacterium. Its crystal structure shows that Leu36 is fully buried in the hydrophobic core, Lys72 lies on the solvent-exposed surface with its side chain making no contacts with other residues, and Cys22 and Cys88 are joined by the protein's only disulfide bond. The team expressed wild-type P110 and three variants: L36A, K72A, and the double mutant C22S/C88S. Each protein was purified and dialyzed into 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0.

Unfolding was monitored by circular dichroism (CD) at 222 nm, a wavelength at which the signal reports α-helical secondary structure. In thermal experiments, samples (10 µM) were heated from 30 °C to 90 °C at 1 °C/min, and the CD signal was converted to the fraction of molecules unfolded (Figure 1). The melting temperature, Tm, was taken as the midpoint of each transition. Heating and then cooling wild-type P110 restored more than 95% of its original CD signal. In chemical experiments, samples at 25 °C were equilibrated overnight in 0–8 M urea. The urea concentration at the midpoint of each transition (Cm) was recorded, and ΔG°unf in the absence of urea was obtained by linear extrapolation of ΔG°unf versus urea concentration to 0 M. All four proteins gave the same slope of that line, −4.6 kJ·mol⁻¹·M⁻¹ (stability falls by 4.6 kJ/mol for each molar of urea). Results are summarized in Table 1; each value is the mean of three independent preparations, and standard deviations were below 0.4 °C for Tm and below 0.8 kJ/mol for ΔG°unf.

ProteinTm (°C)Cm, urea (M)ΔG°unf (kJ/mol)
Wild type68.45.224
L36A54.1313.8
K72A67.95.123.5
C22S/C88S57.23.717
Table 1 Stability of wild-type P110 and three variants (pH 7.0; ΔG°unf and Cm at 25 °C)
00.20.40.60.81 020406080100 Temperature (°C) Fraction unfolded
  • Wild type
  • L36A
  • C22S/C88S
Figure 1 Thermal unfolding of wild-type P110 and two variants, monitored by CD at 222 nm

Data are illustrative, constructed for practice.

1. Based on Table 1, by how much does the L36A substitution change the free energy of unfolding of P110 at 25 °C?

2. Which explanation best accounts for the finding that L36A destabilizes P110 far more than K72A does?

3. The C22S/C88S variant could be less stable because the disulfide is lost or because serine itself is poorly tolerated at positions 22 and 88. Which additional experiment would best distinguish these possibilities?

4. The researchers plan one more variant at position 36. Which replacement for Leu36 would be expected to destabilize P110 the least?

5. A sample of the L36A variant in buffer without urea is held at 54.1 °C until it reaches equilibrium. Which value is closest to ΔG°unf for this sample at that temperature?