MCAT practice · Biological and Biochemical Foundations · 3A Nervous and endocrine systems · 1A Proteins and enzymes

Agonists, an antagonist and desensitization at a Gs-coupled receptor

An original practice passage written for this site, not an AAMC item. Exam pace is about 8 minutes for a passage like this.

The β2-adrenergic receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor that signals through Gαs to adenylyl cyclase. Researchers characterized three ligands in a line of cultured kidney cells that stably expresses the human receptor: agonist A, compound B and compound P.

In Experiment 1, cells were incubated for 15 minutes with increasing concentrations of agonist A or compound B, and intracellular cAMP was measured by immunoassay. Every incubation contained IBMX, an inhibitor of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases. To test compound P, cells were exposed to 10 nM compound P for 10 minutes before agonist A was added. Responses were expressed as a percentage of the maximal cAMP rise produced by agonist A alone (Figure 1). Agonist A had an EC50 of about 3 nM. In the same cells, phosphorylation of CREB, a transcription factor that is a substrate of protein kinase A, reached half its maximum at about 0.3 nM agonist A.

In Experiment 2, the researchers asked why responses faded during prolonged exposure. Cells were pretreated for 30 minutes with vehicle, with 1 µM agonist A, or with 1 µM agonist A plus compound G, a selective inhibitor of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2). The cells were washed three times, rested for 5 minutes, and then challenged for 10 minutes with either 1 µM agonist A or 10 µM forskolin, a plant diterpene that binds and activates adenylyl cyclase directly. Basal cAMP in unstimulated cells was about 4 pmol per well under all three pretreatments (Table 1).

Pretreatment with agonist A cut the response to a second dose of agonist A by about two thirds, while the forskolin response changed little. Compound G largely prevented the loss. The researchers concluded that prolonged agonist exposure weakens the receptor's coupling to the cascade.

020406080100120 -12-10-8-6-4-20 log [ligand] (M) cAMP (% of maximal response to agonist A)
  • Agonist A
  • Agonist A + 10 nM compound P
  • Compound B
Figure 1 cAMP accumulation as a percentage of the maximal response to agonist A, in the presence of IBMX. Mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments.
PretreatmentChallenge: 1 µM agonist A (pmol/well)Challenge: 10 µM forskolin (pmol/well)
Vehicle52 ± 3121 ± 6
1 µM agonist A18 ± 2114 ± 7
1 µM agonist A + compound G44 ± 3118 ± 5
Table 1 cAMP after a 10-minute challenge in cells given each 30-minute pretreatment, then washed. Mean ± SEM, n = 4 wells.

Data are illustrative, constructed for practice.

1. Which statement best describes the effect of compound P in Figure 1 and the kind of antagonism it suggests?

2. In Experiment 2, what was the main purpose of challenging some pretreated cells with forskolin rather than with agonist A?

3. Cholera toxin ADP-ribosylates Gαs. If cells like those in Experiment 1 were first treated with cholera toxin, what would basal cAMP (no agonist) most likely be, and how would adding compound P alone affect it?

4. Agonist A half-maximally stimulated CREB phosphorylation at about one tenth the concentration needed to half-maximally raise cAMP. Which explanation is most consistent with this finding?

5. Cells are incubated with 1 µM agonist A and 100 µM compound B added together. Assuming both ligands bind the same site on the receptor with similar affinity, cAMP accumulation would most likely: