Developmental Neuroscience · Unit 6: Axons find their way
Pioneers, Guideposts and the Logic of Guidance Cues
How does a growth cone know which way to go? This lesson sorts guidance cues into four classes, then shows how a long route is cut into short legs by pioneer axons, guidepost cells and the bundles that later axons follow, using grasshopper, fly and chick experiments. Afterwards you can read a loss-of-function and a gain-of-function phenotype together, and explain why one cue can attract one axon and repel another.
Watch first A Long Route in Short Legs · 2:38
In the growing leg of a grasshopper embryo, the first two axons to head for the central nervous system have no other axons to follow. Kill a particular guidepost cell along their route before they get there, and they lose their way.
That result, from David Bentley and Michael Caudy in 1983, is a clue to how a growth cone navigates. It does not carry a map. It reads its surroundings one stretch at a time, and some of what it reads is other cells. This lesson asks what those signals are, how a long route gets broken into short pieces, and why the same signal can mean different things to different axons.
What provides directional information to growth cones?
The growth cone is the moving tip of a growing axon: a fan of actin with fingers called filopodia, backed by microtubules from the axon shaft. It advances when adhesion grips the substrate, and it turns when that balance differs between its two sides (see that lesson). The question here is what tells it which side to favour.
The answers sort into four classes, set by two questions. Is the cue fixed to a cell or to the matrix between cells, so that it acts on contact, or is it released and spread through the tissue, so that it acts at a distance? And does it draw the growth cone in or push it away?
- Contact attraction. Laminin in the extracellular matrix; adhesion molecules such as L1 on other axons.
- Contact repulsion. Ephrins on cell surfaces, which make growth cones carrying the matching Eph receptor collapse and retreat.
- Long-range attraction. Netrin-1, secreted by the floor plate at the ventral midline of the spinal cord, which draws commissural axons toward it.
- Long-range repulsion. Slit at the same midline, and secreted semaphorins such as Sema3A.
The classes describe how a cue behaves in a given experiment, not a fixed property of the molecule. Netrin can act at short range when it is held on cell surfaces, and later lessons take each family in turn.
The cleanest test of a long-range cue is a pipette. In 1979 Gundersen and Barrett set a fine pipette releasing nerve growth factor (NGF) beside growing axons of chick sensory neurons, and the growth cones turned toward it within about twenty minutes. The turn was more than faster growth, which is what makes it chemotaxis: steering up a gradient.
The genome holds far too few genes to name every connection in a brain (the arithmetic is in that lesson). The genome gets around this in two ways. Cues act in combination, so a few families give many distinct readings. And the route is shortened.
Break the long journey into manageable legs
A long trajectory is hard to steer in one go. A trail with signposts every few hundred metres is easy. Axons use the same trick. The neuron’s own ability to grow is not enough: growing axons “need signs.”
The first axons through a territory are pioneers. They travel when the tissue is small and distances are short, and they have nothing to follow. Later axons, the followers, often grow along them. Along the pioneers’ route sit guidepost cells and intermediate targets: places where the growth cone stops, reads something and changes course.
The worked case is the grasshopper leg. Near the tip of the developing leg, a pair of sensory neurons called Ti1 sends axons toward the central nervous system. The route has several turns, and at some of them sit young neurons that the Ti1 growth cones touch just before they turn. One of these is Cx1.
Bentley and Caudy wanted to know whether the growth cones need Cx1. Insect neurons carry a surface sugar that antibodies against horseradish peroxidase recognize, so antibodies of this kind can mark identified neurons. Bentley and Caudy destroyed Cx1 with focused light before the Ti1 growth cones arrived, then cultured the embryos and stained the axons. The pioneers failed to take the normal route and sent branches in abnormal directions.
The conclusion is narrow, and that is its strength. At this turn, in this preparation, Cx1 is needed. The experiment does not say what Cx1 provides, whether adhesion or a signal, and later work by Caudy and Bentley found that the full Ti1 route is built from several legs, read partly from guideposts and partly from boundaries in the surrounding tissue. A guidepost is one important cue among several.
The labeled pathway hypothesis
Followers do not grow along just any axon. When axons grow bundled together they are fasciculated; when one leaves its bundle it defasciculates.
Jonathan Raper, Michael Bastiani and Corey Goodman showed how selective this is, again in grasshopper embryos, whose central neurons can be named and filled with dye one at a time. A neuron called G grows into a region crossed by many longitudinal axon bundles, joins one of them, the A/P fascicle, and grows forward along the P axons within it. Its filopodia reach other bundles, yet it chooses this one. When the team killed the P neurons before G arrived, G failed to extend far along its normal route and did not adopt any other bundle within reach. This led to the labeled pathway hypothesis: each bundle carries surface labels, and each growth cone has receptors for some of them. The ablation alone cannot tell whether P axons instructed G or simply offered the one usable surface.
The labels were found in the fruit fly, Drosophila. Fasciclin II is a member of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily of adhesion molecules and binds Fasciclin II on a neighbouring axon. Its vertebrate relative is NCAM. The two phenotypes are complementary. Without Fasciclin II, axons that normally travel together in certain pathways drift apart. With extra Fasciclin II in motor neurons, motor axons that should leave their nerve at a branch point stay stuck in it and bypass their muscles. Opposite manipulations give opposite results, so the amount of adhesion between axons is what matters.
A second fly gene, beaten path (beat), encodes a protein secreted by motor neurons. In beat mutants, motor axons fail to leave their nerve at choice points.
Design problem
A Drosophila motor axon in a beat mutant fails to leave its nerve. Predict the phenotype of a beat; fasII double mutant, and say what it tells you about how Beat works.
One way to do it
Consider two models. In the first, Beat steers the axon toward its muscle. Then removing Fasciclin II should not help: the axon would still have no instruction to go to the muscle, and the double mutant would look like beat or worse. In the second, Beat lets an axon leave by weakening the Fasciclin II adhesion that holds it to its neighbours. Then removing Fasciclin II should restore defasciculation, and the double mutant would look closer to normal.
The second is what Fambrough and Goodman reported in 1996: reducing Fasciclin II suppressed the beat phenotype. So Beat acts by opposing adhesion between axons, not by pointing the way. A further check follows: extra Fasciclin II in a normal fly should mimic a beat mutant, and it does: extra Fasciclin II on motor neurons produced bypass phenotypes (Lin and Goodman, 1994).
Vertebrates show the same logic at choice points. Kathryn Tosney and Lynn Landmesser labeled chick motor axons growing into the hindlimb. At the plexus, where motor axons sort into dorsal and ventral nerve trunks, and where muscle nerves branch off, the growth cones were larger and more complex and turned more often. In straight stretches they were small and simple. Later time-lapse imaging, in mouse retinal axons, matched complex shapes to growth cones that had paused. And growth cone pausing is closely related to axon branching. Branches tend to form where a growth cone has stopped to read its surroundings.
Do growth cones like more adhesive or less adhesive substrate?
Given a choice in culture, growth cones tend to follow the more adhesive surface (Paul Letourneau, 1975, with chick sensory neurons). That makes it tempting to say adhesion is what they want. But do growth cones grow faster on the more adhesive surface? Often not: neurons can grow more slowly on more adhesive substrates, and in several culture studies how sticky a surface is turned out to be a poor predictor of growth rate.
The clutch model explains why. With too little grip, the actin network slips backward and the edge does not advance. With too much, the growth cone cannot let go of old adhesions to move on. Growth is fastest at intermediate adhesion, and the surface also signals.
Laminin is the clearest case. It is a large glycoprotein of basement membranes, and in the early 1980s several laboratories found that it strongly promotes neurite growth in culture. Neurons read laminin through integrins, receptors made of an alpha and a beta chain. In 1986 Kevin Tomaselli, Louis Reichardt and John Bixby blocked integrins with antibodies on dishes where cell bodies could still attach through a second coating. Outgrowth on laminin stopped while the cells stayed down, so integrins were needed for extension, not only to hold the cell on. Integrins link the matrix to actin and signal through Rho-family GTPases (that lesson).
Growth cones carry three main families of adhesion molecule:
- Cadherins, such as N-cadherin, which need calcium and bind the same cadherin on another cell.
- Ig-superfamily CAMs, such as NCAM and L1, which bind the same molecule or a different one. Fasciclin II and neuroglian are their fly relatives.
- Integrins, which bind matrix proteins such as laminin. Mammals have 18 alpha and 8 beta chains, forming 24 known pairs.
A uniform coat of laminin permits growth but gives no direction. A border or a gradient can.
Attraction and repulsion can flip.
The same cue can attract one axon and repel another. Netrin-1 attracts growth cones that carry the receptor DCC alone and repels those that carry DCC with a second receptor, UNC5. Inside a single growth cone, the answer can change too. In cultured Xenopus spinal neurons, lowering cAMP signaling turned attraction to netrin-1 into repulsion. Xenopus retinal growth cones are attracted by netrin-1 on their own, but laminin turns that response into repulsion.
So a cue is a message, and the receptors and internal state of the growth cone decide what it means. That is why a few cue families can wire many different axons: a cell that changes its receptors or its cAMP level reads the same tissue differently.
There is one more reason to expect several cues at each choice point. An axon cannot easily take back what it has built. At choice points, a contact cue usually works beside a long-range one, and an attractant beside a repellent. If one system fails, the growth cone is still not sent somewhere it cannot recover from. The next lessons take these systems apart: netrin and DCC, Slit and Robo at the midline and semaphorins. For the receptor families themselves, see that lesson.
How we measure it
Killing an identified cell before an axon arrives
In insect embryos individual cells can be recognized and labeled, then destroyed with focused light or a microelectrode before a growth cone reaches them. Comparing the route with an operated control on a nearby spot asks whether that one cell is needed for a normal turn.
Dye filling of identified neurons
A neuron is injected with a fluorescent dye such as Lucifer Yellow or with horseradish peroxidase, which fills its axon and growth cone. Because the same named neuron can be found in every embryo, you can ask which bundle it chooses and whom its growth cone touches.
Loss-of-function, gain-of-function and double mutants in Drosophila
Remove a gene, express it in extra cells or at higher levels, or combine two mutations, then stain the motor axons with an antibody. Opposite phenotypes from loss and gain point to a quantity the gene sets; a double mutant can show that one gene works by opposing another.
Substrate choice and pipette turning assays
Neurons are grown on dishes coated with patterns of different substrates, or near a pipette releasing a cue. Which surface the growth cones follow, how fast they grow, and whether they turn toward or away from a source each test a different property of the cue.
Finish line
Test yourself
8 questions
Practice and MCAT-style, with explained answers.
Next · Lesson 23
Netrin and DCC: One Cue, Two Answers
The same protein pulls one axon toward the midline and pushes another away. What decides?
Continue →